[New York, 4/10/14]
When Victoria Nuland resigned, many commentators saw this as proof of her failure in Ukraine. If her objective was not to beat Russia, but to have as many Slavs killed as possible, then Nuland succeeded spectacularly. This was my contention all along. Nuland’s death count is still rising.
For three years, Steve Kirsch has spoken against Covid “vaccines.” Though he has proven they’ve killed millions, Kirsch sees official denial of this as ignorance or wilful blindness, not criminal culpability. How long will it take for Kirsch to concede Jewjabs aren’t mistakes, but deliberate weapons?
Worse than Kirsch, Ron Unz attributes Jewjab deaths to Covid or long Covid. To make his point, Unz cites the Economist!
Since 2020 The Economist has maintained the most authoritative account of the human toll and by its reckoning, the total number of “excess deaths” worldwide has nearly reached thirty million, while many billions more had their lives greatly disrupted by the lockdowns and economic dislocations.
To those unfamiliar with the Economist, consider this 4/24/24 headline, “Finally, America’s Congress does right by Ukraine.” Above it is this curious tag, “Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition.” From the article:
After months of bitter wrangling, the House of Representatives passed a bill to appropriate $61bn to help Ukraine defend itself against Russia. It also passed three other bills: one to help Israel; one to deter China from attacking Taiwan; one a grab-bag of measures including forcing the sale of TikTok to a non-Chinese owner. All four bills are now expected to pass the Senate within days, and President Joe Biden will sign them.
In other word, the Economist wants more American tax money to massacre Slavs and Palestinians, while provoking China by arming Taiwan and hijacking TikTok. In article after article, it’s the voice of the global elite, so of course it would push the Jewjab genocide. Jewish Ron Unz approves, and shame on Muslim Kevin Barrett for mirroring Unz’ stance.
To “help” Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan is to rush America into WWIII, so the Economist wants war. To fight one requires strong men, social cohesion and a robust economy, none of which America has. The Economist’s stances on illegal immigration and gender dysphoria aren’t helping. On 2/23/24, it asked, “Can transgender women breast feed?” By terminology alone, it misleads, for humans without ovaries aren’t women. Near the end of its 696 word article, the Economist concludes:
Breastfeeding by transgender women can help them bond with a baby. However, it would be prudent to assume, at least until there is more evidence, that their milk might not have all the nutritional benefits of female breast milk. If it did, evolution would probably have favoured its use some time ago.
Why compare nonexistent male breast milk to a mother’s? There’s no need to prefix mother with “biological” or “natural.” Until bullshitters like the Economist came along, everyone knew mothers to be women.
As for illegal immigration, here are two recent Economist headlines, “Italy needs more migrants, but has trouble admitting it” and “Migrants contribute more to Britain than they take, and will carry on doing so.” There’s this subtitle after the second, “Reducing immigration will hurt now, and in the future.”
Despite its name, the Economist covers every facet of society, including fashion and music, so it has many articles celebrating Madonna, Diddy, Taylor Swift, Justin Bieber and Miley Cyrus, etc. These industry whores’ appearances in such a respectable mag for clueless squares go a long way in legitimizing them. Reading the Economist, even Ron Unz knows all about grime, drill rap and twerking.
Of that most violent genre, the Economist reassures us “there is little evidence that drill songs lead directly to offline aggression.” Jewjabs are also perfectly safe and effective, even for infants and pregnant women.
America’s key enemies are Russia, China and Iran. Unlike Uncle Sam, they don’t push crossdressers, lactating men, illegal immigration, degenerate music, blasphemy or hatred of one’s heritage. They don’t have 8-year-old drill rappers glamorizing flash robberies, bearded drag queens confusing kindergarteners or a naked man on stage at an award show. As for Jewjabs, they’re not available in Russia, with distribution in Iran very limited. In China, only Germans can be Jewjabbed! Rejecting America’s social agenda, these countries have a clear advantage in any confrontation, so what in hell is high heeled Samuel doing?
Civil War has just been released. In Vietnam, its title has been changed to Ngày Tàn Của Đế Quốc, or An Empire’s Last Days. After its civil war, Vietnam has more or less recovered. Reverting to their age old habits, good and bad, Vietnamese worship Taoist gods, visit fortune tellers, run red lights, eat out often and can sit for hours in alleys or cafes to watch life goes by. Though canned music and the cellphone have eroded their sociability, they still have a sane appetite for yakking.
Though Civil War is billed as a dystopian depiction of a future America, that war is well underway. Everything the US does harms its citizens. Its mind scrambling, economic crippling, Jewjabbing and literal castrations are just the beginning. Ridden hard, Uncle Sam wants most of you gone.
Since most Americans don’t know they’re in a civil war, almost none is fighting back. Plus, that’s too much to ask from those thoroughly cowed, if not cross dressing and trying their best to squeeze some nipple discharge from their flabby or sunken chest, as they twerk to Sexyy Red.
The Economist was always a Rothschild rag (literally owned by the Rothschild, Cadbury and Agnelli families, three of the richest families in Europe), but it has gotten considerably worse in the last years. They used to at least have decent prose, now not even that. Anything that's bad, you can count on them to defend. But defending "transgender milk" really has hit a new low... :-(
As for America, I wish all it did was "harming its own citizens" ... No, they want to harm everyone, from pushing "trans rights" in Albania and Uganda to promoting multiculturalism in Japan (Obama's handler Rahm Emmanuel is there as US Ambassador, making sure it happens).
Linh,
Your 8 words about him has been met with 2,000 words from Kevin Barrett, who defends Ron Unz and accuses you of being some sort of disinfo agent. The real disinfo agent may in fact be Unz with his preposterous theory that covid was a US biowarfare attack on China gone wrong and that the vax campaign was a desperate attempt to protect American citizens from the blowback. Unz plays the part of the dissident who ultimately carries water for the establishment -- a role mastered by Noam Chomsky. Unz repeatedly dissed "anti-vaxxers" who figured out, correctly, that Uncle Sam was not there to help them. Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt have documented the legal bureaucracy that facilitated this attack by the US government on its own citizens. There is a mountain of evidence that the c-19 injections caused millions of deaths and injuries -- all of it officially ignored. If we had a caring government, why would this be? Unz never explains why 190 countries were immediately onboard with the supposed "pandemic", all with the same line, the same fear campaign. If this was an emergency blowback, how did it get organized so quickly and so consistently across the world?
It would be good for Ron Unz to spend a few days with people who were seriously injured by the real bioweapon -- the covid injection. And it's a pity that someone as intelligent as Kevin Barrett has thrown in his lot with Ron Unz. It's to your credit that you left that site Linh.
As to the Jewish role: who heads the CDC, HHS, Pfizer,the US government itself? Will Mandy Clohen expose the lies of Rochelle Walensky and Albert Bourla? No, the CDC is still pushing the vax.