Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Linh Dinh's avatar

Hi everyone,

To make a sharper distinction between Lawson and Paterson, I just added this paragraph to the essay:

As poets, they used conventional forms, but Lawson’s diction is much more natural. Unlike Paterson, Lawson didn’t poeticize his landscape or people, so there are no “fairest maids,” “city urchin,” “fields of youth,” “carol of the magpie,” “smiling plain” or “swain.” Instead, we get “a stealer and duffer of cattle,” “treacherous blacks in the darkness crept,” “men whose childhood knew the brothels and the slums” and “the spiritless dingo in tow of my heels.” Lawson’s people die of disease, rum and sorrow. His women plough, grub, mend fences, milk cows, drive nags, sew, wash and sometimes sing to themselves until they drop dead.

Linh

Expand full comment
Jon Orton's avatar

Your past few articles about SE Queensland have made enjoyable, and educational, reading. There's been a subtle change of tone between the way you describe the eastern USA or eastern Asia and how you've experienced Australia. Perhaps that comes from being so intimate with the two former areas by contrast with SE Queensland which you seem to view slightly more abstractly - but with no loss of penetrating observation.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts