In contrast to Frank, I found you specifically because you call out Jews when they scheme. Of course, in the spheres I follow, that really isn’t so uncommon. Thus, I found myself wanting to stick around for the cultural insight and your way with words. I’m not very cultured myself. I don’t know what’s truly good vs what snobs like to pompously name drop as good. I read some Houellebecq a few years ago. I liked it, but I may have just been horny. I threw it all out when I found the Church. I can’t tempt the old man in me with that stuff. I’m too weak. I liked David Foster Wallace. Like many others, I read the first 139 pages of Infinite Jest. I think he’s genuinely good, but maybe I’m just a snob myself. He seemed very earnest though. A man seeking some sort of truth and art. I pray God has mercy on his soul. Anyway, I enjoy your writing a lot. I’d enjoy it even if you stopped naming the Jew. But it’s a nice bonus nonetheless.
There is no better proof that Jewish power is real than that it is illegal to point it out. And with a Zionist puppet as U.S. president, pointing it out might land you in jail.
I doubt your critic was devoted to your writing because of your insight into the arts. Just a Hasbara emissary wanting you to get in line.
Criticizing Jews or noticing their tremendous power is the worst thing a human can do. How do we know that? Jews have told us.
Jews are the most tribal group on the planet (or at least tied for first) but they have convinced whites it is evil to be tribal and have ingroup preference, something Jews excel at.
I never could figure out why Phillip Roth was considered such a genius until I realized it was Jewish critics praising a Jew.
Same with all the ugly modern art. Promoted largely by Jews and often the artists are Jews.
But the arts are just a tiny sample of Jewish ingroup power.
Why do Jews dominate the number of white students in the Ivy league and Stanford? All the administrations directors (and president's) are Jews.
Why were the Bolsheviks able to win? They were almost all Jews and were funded by Jewish bankers.
When Americans condemn Hollywood morals, porn, the press, big pharma, globalists, bankers and open borders, they are really condemning Jews but they can't acknowledge that because anti Semitism is the greatest taboo. (Fun fact: The top porn site, PornHub, is owned and run by a Rabbi).
The ADL acknowledges this by stating the terms globalists, Deep State and bankers are anti semetic
Allen Ginsberg on our common humanity. (From the North American Man Boy Love Association Wikipedia page)
Ginsberg said: "Attacks on NAMBLA stink of politics, witchhunting for profit, humorlessness, vanity, anger and ignorance ... I'm a member of NAMBLA because I love boys too—everybody does, who has a little humanity."
New acronym MAPs, minor attracted persons. Give me Kerouac any day over Ginsberg. Burroughs too, even Corso. Ginsberg got the big push because he was Jewish and gay.
I heard about SNAP on on the radio years ago. It was on NPR, so there had to be a motive, maybe church bashing:
SNAP, Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests.
I tried to read some Beat stuff years ago. I had some Burroughs on cassette tape that I used to enjoy. It was almost obligatory to like that scene for young "hipsters" in the nineties. In retrospect, their glorification of drugs served no good end. Ginsberg's pictures and his little Bhuddist finger bells don't strike me as very profound, pompous maybe.
After I started reading Bukowski, I didn't pay the Beat stuff much mind.
I really haven't read much poetry. After Bukowski, I mistakenly thought that alcohol was the source and got lost for awhile. Not really complaining, it had it's moments.
Bukowski was the patron saint of the bohemian crowd I hung with in post-bar and abandoned-waterfront Hoboken before it got discovered and renovated by "gold coast" realtors. Here's a photo of AG w/ finger cymbals and a not-too-lengthy article that links Kerouac's Beat Culture to Oswald Spengler's Decline of the West: https://lawliberty.org/the-beat-generation-and-the-decline-of-the-west/
That's a great picture! Finger cymbals and peace pin.
It's easy to turn some of these guys into cult heroes. They definitely attract crowds and accolades, so what's a little kiddy diddling?
My parents took me to see Ken Kesey at a local community college festival when I was in my late teens. He read some and bullshitted the rest of the time. Pretty bombastic from what I remember, talked about spraying LSD on whole countries
as a plausible solution to whatever the frick he was talking about. Not very serious and everyone claps. A psychedelic neocon? Pretty tame in retrospect, still glad I got to go.
"Kiddy diddling" reminds me of P Diddy. My mailman told me one of my neighbors in adjacent Jersey City, Mike Tyson, kept pigeons on his roof. He had this memorable tv encounter w/ Diddy. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/SiB87C1xeMY
I love how I'm still partly brainwashed. You can talk about whites all day long but some deep seated conditioning cringes within me every time you use the word Jew. Like I've hit the edge in Operation.
Now this was a good short but sweet article. It's easy to be a success when your 'family" owns the newspapers, publishing companies, art and film critics, art galleries/institutes, California, etc. etc. etc. Thanks.
I am curious he did not mention one of my very favourite writers Isaac Bashevis Singer. I wonder why. He was definitely Jewish and quite well known, if a Nobel prize counts for anything. I am not well-read like you Lin so have not read or even heard of many of the others. But the fact that Jews punch well above their weight in most cultural affairs is hardly a matter of conjecture. I confess to not getting the points either of you make. As far as i am concerned you are a very fine and unique writer and if we do not always see eye to eye on some topics, so what?
A brief but telling collection of modern Jewish art - Borofsky and Serra littering public spaces w/ mediocrity and Barnett Newman's feeble attempt at blasphemy (at least Serrano's Piss Christ showed a little Latin machismo). But I like Schnabel. Even tho it's a gimmick, the broken crockery works for me as pop mosaic. Not that Julian is first rate, not Marc Chagall by a long shot, but his trope is original at least in terms of Pop.
Having spent so much time in my life reading, I'm sure there are plenty of Jewish authors in the mix that I don't even remember any more. Not too long ago, I finished an exhaustive collection of Bernard Malamud's writing. He's not just a writer who happens to be a Jew--a good bit of his writing revolves around Jewish experience, especially in the US, including his own. That mood and feeling almost seeps out of the page--it is felt as much as it is read. I would have to label it "Jewishness" for lack of a better term. The only other writer I have read that I recall duplicating that is Saul Bellow, who I only read once or twice.
Years ago, the first of Malamud's novels I read was "The Natural", after seeing the movie (with Robert Redford). I really liked both the movie and the book, but Hollywood didn't like Malamud's downbeat ending, so they completely changed it. It is amusing to reflect on the fact that the Jewish movie industry in Hollywood decided that they knew better what the public would like than the Jewish writer from New York. Apparently they were right, because as I understand it, the novel did not garner much attention when it came out, but the movie did rather well.
Interestingly, although he set several novels in New York, where there are enough Jews that they are one of the city's subcultures, his semi-autobiographical novel "A New Life" was set in a fictional state of Cascadia in a university town. It is clearly a fictionalized version of Oregon State University, where he was a teacher for a number of years. Having lived in Oregon myself, and experienced the real life version of the town he writes about, it is easy to imagine it as it once was. And as you might expect, the Jewish New York character does not fit in really well in a small Oregon university town.
In contrast to Frank, I found you specifically because you call out Jews when they scheme. Of course, in the spheres I follow, that really isn’t so uncommon. Thus, I found myself wanting to stick around for the cultural insight and your way with words. I’m not very cultured myself. I don’t know what’s truly good vs what snobs like to pompously name drop as good. I read some Houellebecq a few years ago. I liked it, but I may have just been horny. I threw it all out when I found the Church. I can’t tempt the old man in me with that stuff. I’m too weak. I liked David Foster Wallace. Like many others, I read the first 139 pages of Infinite Jest. I think he’s genuinely good, but maybe I’m just a snob myself. He seemed very earnest though. A man seeking some sort of truth and art. I pray God has mercy on his soul. Anyway, I enjoy your writing a lot. I’d enjoy it even if you stopped naming the Jew. But it’s a nice bonus nonetheless.
There is no better proof that Jewish power is real than that it is illegal to point it out. And with a Zionist puppet as U.S. president, pointing it out might land you in jail.
I doubt your critic was devoted to your writing because of your insight into the arts. Just a Hasbara emissary wanting you to get in line.
Criticizing Jews or noticing their tremendous power is the worst thing a human can do. How do we know that? Jews have told us.
Jews are the most tribal group on the planet (or at least tied for first) but they have convinced whites it is evil to be tribal and have ingroup preference, something Jews excel at.
I never could figure out why Phillip Roth was considered such a genius until I realized it was Jewish critics praising a Jew.
Same with all the ugly modern art. Promoted largely by Jews and often the artists are Jews.
But the arts are just a tiny sample of Jewish ingroup power.
Why do Jews dominate the number of white students in the Ivy league and Stanford? All the administrations directors (and president's) are Jews.
Why were the Bolsheviks able to win? They were almost all Jews and were funded by Jewish bankers.
When Americans condemn Hollywood morals, porn, the press, big pharma, globalists, bankers and open borders, they are really condemning Jews but they can't acknowledge that because anti Semitism is the greatest taboo. (Fun fact: The top porn site, PornHub, is owned and run by a Rabbi).
The ADL acknowledges this by stating the terms globalists, Deep State and bankers are anti semetic
jews are a kind, considerate and compassionate people, BUT only amongst themselves.
The only reason they punch well above their weight in writing and art, acting etc. is the
Fact all the publishers, gallery owners, promotors and media et al. are jewish owned or
Controlled, they have the money and infrastructure to manipulate and propagandise the
General public into believing these children of the richest are talented, whilst the non-jew
Is ignored at best.
Allen Ginsberg on our common humanity. (From the North American Man Boy Love Association Wikipedia page)
Ginsberg said: "Attacks on NAMBLA stink of politics, witchhunting for profit, humorlessness, vanity, anger and ignorance ... I'm a member of NAMBLA because I love boys too—everybody does, who has a little humanity."
New acronym MAPs, minor attracted persons. Give me Kerouac any day over Ginsberg. Burroughs too, even Corso. Ginsberg got the big push because he was Jewish and gay.
I heard about SNAP on on the radio years ago. It was on NPR, so there had to be a motive, maybe church bashing:
SNAP, Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests.
I tried to read some Beat stuff years ago. I had some Burroughs on cassette tape that I used to enjoy. It was almost obligatory to like that scene for young "hipsters" in the nineties. In retrospect, their glorification of drugs served no good end. Ginsberg's pictures and his little Bhuddist finger bells don't strike me as very profound, pompous maybe.
After I started reading Bukowski, I didn't pay the Beat stuff much mind.
I really haven't read much poetry. After Bukowski, I mistakenly thought that alcohol was the source and got lost for awhile. Not really complaining, it had it's moments.
Bukowski was the patron saint of the bohemian crowd I hung with in post-bar and abandoned-waterfront Hoboken before it got discovered and renovated by "gold coast" realtors. Here's a photo of AG w/ finger cymbals and a not-too-lengthy article that links Kerouac's Beat Culture to Oswald Spengler's Decline of the West: https://lawliberty.org/the-beat-generation-and-the-decline-of-the-west/
That's a great picture! Finger cymbals and peace pin.
It's easy to turn some of these guys into cult heroes. They definitely attract crowds and accolades, so what's a little kiddy diddling?
My parents took me to see Ken Kesey at a local community college festival when I was in my late teens. He read some and bullshitted the rest of the time. Pretty bombastic from what I remember, talked about spraying LSD on whole countries
as a plausible solution to whatever the frick he was talking about. Not very serious and everyone claps. A psychedelic neocon? Pretty tame in retrospect, still glad I got to go.
"Kiddy diddling" reminds me of P Diddy. My mailman told me one of my neighbors in adjacent Jersey City, Mike Tyson, kept pigeons on his roof. He had this memorable tv encounter w/ Diddy. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/SiB87C1xeMY
Mike and his pigeons! That's inspiration.
This YouTube clip is going to be good.
Many thanks Billy.
I was wondering if you gave Ernie his wish. lol
I love how I'm still partly brainwashed. You can talk about whites all day long but some deep seated conditioning cringes within me every time you use the word Jew. Like I've hit the edge in Operation.
Now this was a good short but sweet article. It's easy to be a success when your 'family" owns the newspapers, publishing companies, art and film critics, art galleries/institutes, California, etc. etc. etc. Thanks.
I am curious he did not mention one of my very favourite writers Isaac Bashevis Singer. I wonder why. He was definitely Jewish and quite well known, if a Nobel prize counts for anything. I am not well-read like you Lin so have not read or even heard of many of the others. But the fact that Jews punch well above their weight in most cultural affairs is hardly a matter of conjecture. I confess to not getting the points either of you make. As far as i am concerned you are a very fine and unique writer and if we do not always see eye to eye on some topics, so what?
A brief but telling collection of modern Jewish art - Borofsky and Serra littering public spaces w/ mediocrity and Barnett Newman's feeble attempt at blasphemy (at least Serrano's Piss Christ showed a little Latin machismo). But I like Schnabel. Even tho it's a gimmick, the broken crockery works for me as pop mosaic. Not that Julian is first rate, not Marc Chagall by a long shot, but his trope is original at least in terms of Pop.
Having spent so much time in my life reading, I'm sure there are plenty of Jewish authors in the mix that I don't even remember any more. Not too long ago, I finished an exhaustive collection of Bernard Malamud's writing. He's not just a writer who happens to be a Jew--a good bit of his writing revolves around Jewish experience, especially in the US, including his own. That mood and feeling almost seeps out of the page--it is felt as much as it is read. I would have to label it "Jewishness" for lack of a better term. The only other writer I have read that I recall duplicating that is Saul Bellow, who I only read once or twice.
Years ago, the first of Malamud's novels I read was "The Natural", after seeing the movie (with Robert Redford). I really liked both the movie and the book, but Hollywood didn't like Malamud's downbeat ending, so they completely changed it. It is amusing to reflect on the fact that the Jewish movie industry in Hollywood decided that they knew better what the public would like than the Jewish writer from New York. Apparently they were right, because as I understand it, the novel did not garner much attention when it came out, but the movie did rather well.
Interestingly, although he set several novels in New York, where there are enough Jews that they are one of the city's subcultures, his semi-autobiographical novel "A New Life" was set in a fictional state of Cascadia in a university town. It is clearly a fictionalized version of Oregon State University, where he was a teacher for a number of years. Having lived in Oregon myself, and experienced the real life version of the town he writes about, it is easy to imagine it as it once was. And as you might expect, the Jewish New York character does not fit in really well in a small Oregon university town.