"The West’s implosion was apparent decades ago to anyone paying attention. Its degeneracy coincides with its bankruptcy."
__
Spot on, sir.
Offshoring jobs, years of Jewish television shows and related propaganda, and 9-11, were major redpills for me. It's been truly a quick slide down the exponential decay curve as of recent... all downhill. Sad.
Actually America is doing splendid. That is if you consider who really counts in America. Many Americans naively believe America (the United States) is a homogeneous society in which "anyone can succeed if one just works hard enough and works to get a good education." In reality America is the most caste like society among Western industrial nations.
For the capitalists, the real owners of society, "You have owners, they own you..." (George Carlin) America is doing great. For the middle-class and the poor, America is not doing all that great.
The American working-class has been barely treading water and falling behind since Reagan's election in 1980 and the economic doctrine of "Neoliberalism" (not to be confused with political liberalism) began. This was the beginning of the 40 year long era of deregulation of business, tax cuts for the wealthy, wage stagnation for the lower and middle classes (the federal minimum wage has been stuck at $7.25 an hour for 15 years now) and an exponential increase in rents for the lower classes began.(Due to housing shortages for the poor and a lack of rent control measures in a nation that fetishises "free-markets." Free markets only work well when the two parties to a contract have more or less equal bargaining power. Something tenants in America do not have.)
America is doing great for the obscenely wealthy. The top ten richest people in the country have over a trillion dollars in wealth. Bill Gates , Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerburg alone have more wealth than the bottom half of the country or so. That's 160 million Americans in or near poverty.
So from the perspective of the wealthy America is doing great. For everyone else, not so much.
The obese Jewish lesbian announced yesterday that she is suing people who mocked her over the opening ceremony.
How Jewish. Intentionally try to anger Christians by mocking their religion then be the victim when they get angry. And sue!
But there is so much anti Semitism in this world. Hateful people are condemning Jews simply for slaughtering children and anal rape and other torture of prisoners. Don't these people realize that Hitler left a pile of Jewish shoes?
I can't think of a single cause of action, either civil or criminal, that she could file without it being laughed out of court by the judge. "Mockery" is not an actionable offense.
The only remotely -- and I mean very, very remotely -- possible claim she might file successfully would be "intentional infliction of emotional distress" but such claims are rarely successful and to succeed they have to be based on long term, repeated actions inflicted on a person that result in real physical or mental harm. Like, say, for example, calling a person on the phone repeatedly and threatening to kill them or kill one of their family members.
American courts of law generally don't tolerate frivolous claims based on petty grievances.
"but ordinary Brits, including blacks, can’t help but notice their appalling frequency."
I wish the same could be said about American whites.
Whites are for the most part terrified to notice (or at least acknowledge that they have noticed). If they do notice they just buy more guns and let the shitshow continue.
However, getting Whites to publicly acknowledge black crime is not quite as hard as getting them to acknowledge the obvious role Jews play in legalizing it.
They may not dare to talk about it, but don't you think most Americans, of whatever color, notice this? In Philly, everyone knows where the lethal boundaries are. In South Philly, if you go east of Broad and south of Washington after dark, you're asking for it. Even in the daytime, most don't risk straying into Point Breeze. Most never get off at Sommerset, Huntingdon or 60th Street Station, etc. Almost no one in the entire region ever goes to Camden or Chester.
Many probably notice it but can't acknowledge it even to themselves.
Whites and Asians try to stay clear of black areas. Hispanics try and drive them out of Hispanic areas. However, whites cling to the idea that the area is bad just because of a lot of poor people not because it is black.
I think it was Sam Francis who wrote that liberals lead their lives as though they were members of the KKK.
For about three decades I lived in a rather poor section of Sacramento, California. Sacramento is to a considerable extent a working-class town in the agrarian Central Valley, 100 miles north east, and a world away, from well-heeled San Francisco. Rice farms and fruit orchards are a big part of the regional economy. Blue Diamond Almonds is headquartered in Sacramento.
I worked at Sacramento City College for a number of years. Very much a working class school. (By working class I mean people who don't have trust funds and won't inherit large wealth and will thus have to work and somehow "earn" a living.) Sac. City as the college was called, served as a sort of stepping stone for intelligent but poor young people, coming from a background of no means, to vault their way into the University of California (UC)higher educational system (if they had the intellectual acumen) and from there often into high paying jobs in the San Francisco Bay Area, Silicon Valley or Los Angeles and Orange County where the defense industry (by way of taxpayer funded government contracts in the Military Industrial Complex) is a big employer and provider of good salaried employment.
To make a tedious long story short, many of the working-class young women at Sac. City would sometimes (often?) wear suggestive clothing like the young woman in the current essay. Much if not all of this casual clothing was made by a company called, I believe, "Pink." The clothes often had short, pithy sayings on the buttock or breast area with trite comments such as, "Nope, not today." Or, "You Wish." Suggesting that the viewer, apparently presumed to be a leering male, maybe any and every male in the vicinity of the young women, was looking at her and lusting after her.
Perhaps because I was considerably older than most of the students I found this sort of personal advertisement tedious at best and offensive and insulting perhaps at worst.
My only point being the young woman mentioned at the beginning of today's essay has a long pedigree. The idea conveyed by the writing on her t-shirt "I love money only" being, "I will never love you" (the staring male) so don't bother me and go away. The conceit by the female wearer being that virtually every man is out to seduce her but she's going to nip that nascent relationship in the bud without the need to engage in the most perfunctory conversation. I always felt a sort of sad pity for these young women in that as alluring and sexually attractive as they might be at 19 or 21, in another 10 to 15 years, if they hadn't yet "snagged" a man they would find themselves overlooked by the very men who once leered at them (or were perceived to have done so). Such men, now in their thirties and perhaps making decent money, if not already married, now having their eyes on the next younger generation of younger women unencumbered by facial wrinkles and fat. (At least as of now.)
I don't know if this behavior (wearing clothing that essentially insults a man before he has even attempted to open a conversation) is peculiar to the working class females in Sacramento but it interesting (and one might say discouraging) at least to me, to see a bit of it appearing in Vietnam.
Sort of the ancient, perennial "war between the sexes" taken to a modern, semi-literate low point in which conversation is precluded by a snide pre-prepared insult on a t-shirt. (This is arguably an aspect of what some other commentators have called "Californiacation", a debasement of an entire society by consumerism and commercialization and commodification of everything including human beings, but I will spare the reader further rambling.)
I saw that Olympic boxing match in which an obvious male pummeled a female boxer. To me this is an example of how transsexuality and "gender dimorphism" become toxic. (As society attempts to accommodate perversions in the name of "inclusivity.") Letting a large man beat the crap out of a small woman is not "inclusive" it is idiotic and cruel. And perverse.
There is a Christ figure talking to one apostle, but the rest is pagan revelry, including one or two gods, Dionysus and Poseidon. There are no fat butch DJ's or obvious transvestites. There are hetero attractions abounding and inebriation evident. A sober Jesus appears to be visiting at the banquet (and he's brought his heavenly retinue of putti along, maybe to extract him if things get out of hand). It doesn't appear to be a mockery of Christian morality so much as light-hearted satire w/ a winking subtext about who were the original celebrators of fleshly bread and blood infused wine for committed devotees.
I think Jews and free masons weaponize paganism into an attack on Christian values. They taunt w/ distortions of a lost culture which did not believe "do what thou wilt" was the quintessence of Greco-Roman morality as they pretend.
"Sorry, I love money only." (Printed on the young woman's t-shirt.) I always get a good laugh out of people who lust after money. It's kind of like a person who falls in love with an actor's characture in a television show. Not understanding that the characture is not real and doesn't really exist.
Money -- as in physical bills -- is a convenient means of exchange and a representation of wealth. It has value so long as a society collectively agree it has value. Once that agreement is lost money becomes just paper little better than toilet paper to be crude about it.
God save me from boring the reader with the history of paper currency; how it was once backed by gold; how it can be inflated into worthlessness by government overprinting (e.g. Wiemar Germany); how the U.S. dollar's value is (more or less) preserved and held steady by the Federal Reserve Bank; how Alexander Hamilton in 1800 put the dollar on firm footing by, as the first Secretary of Treasury, understanding that a nation's currency would be sound only if its increase did not exceed the growth of goods and services in the economy; and finally, how the BRIC trade bloc may in not too many years undermine the value of the U.S. dollar; (neither to dwell on how the Bretton Woods Agreement after World War Two, very shrewdly crafted by U.S. planners, elevated the U.S. dollar to the Reserve Currency of the world for the past 75 years and which may soon be undermined by the BRIC trade bloc, and the Shanghai Accord.)
People who know what real wealth is invest in valuable real estate and precious metals. (The main reason gold and precious metals have sustained value is they are perceived to be finite in quantity; they can not be debased, devalued or inflated away by the government as paper money can be.) They don't invest (or invest very little) in "money" or paper currency. That's why Bill Gates and China (the CCP) are buying up valuable American farm land.
Hold on to your wallets, folks. So if you're like this young woman and "love only money", now that China and her BRIC economic allies are in the driver's seat, it could be a wild ride for U.S. "money".
The white horse reminds me of one of the last episodes of 'Game of Thrones' where a white horse wanders through the streets of a destroyed city that is inhabited by the dead and dying among the remains of burning, crumbling buildings. The city was destroyed by dragons which are not so far from missiles and drones if you think about it. GOT had some powerful moments.
"The West’s implosion was apparent decades ago to anyone paying attention. Its degeneracy coincides with its bankruptcy."
__
Spot on, sir.
Offshoring jobs, years of Jewish television shows and related propaganda, and 9-11, were major redpills for me. It's been truly a quick slide down the exponential decay curve as of recent... all downhill. Sad.
Actually America is doing splendid. That is if you consider who really counts in America. Many Americans naively believe America (the United States) is a homogeneous society in which "anyone can succeed if one just works hard enough and works to get a good education." In reality America is the most caste like society among Western industrial nations.
For the capitalists, the real owners of society, "You have owners, they own you..." (George Carlin) America is doing great. For the middle-class and the poor, America is not doing all that great.
The American working-class has been barely treading water and falling behind since Reagan's election in 1980 and the economic doctrine of "Neoliberalism" (not to be confused with political liberalism) began. This was the beginning of the 40 year long era of deregulation of business, tax cuts for the wealthy, wage stagnation for the lower and middle classes (the federal minimum wage has been stuck at $7.25 an hour for 15 years now) and an exponential increase in rents for the lower classes began.(Due to housing shortages for the poor and a lack of rent control measures in a nation that fetishises "free-markets." Free markets only work well when the two parties to a contract have more or less equal bargaining power. Something tenants in America do not have.)
America is doing great for the obscenely wealthy. The top ten richest people in the country have over a trillion dollars in wealth. Bill Gates , Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerburg alone have more wealth than the bottom half of the country or so. That's 160 million Americans in or near poverty.
So from the perspective of the wealthy America is doing great. For everyone else, not so much.
The obese Jewish lesbian announced yesterday that she is suing people who mocked her over the opening ceremony.
How Jewish. Intentionally try to anger Christians by mocking their religion then be the victim when they get angry. And sue!
But there is so much anti Semitism in this world. Hateful people are condemning Jews simply for slaughtering children and anal rape and other torture of prisoners. Don't these people realize that Hitler left a pile of Jewish shoes?
On what basis is she going to sue them?
I can't think of a single cause of action, either civil or criminal, that she could file without it being laughed out of court by the judge. "Mockery" is not an actionable offense.
The only remotely -- and I mean very, very remotely -- possible claim she might file successfully would be "intentional infliction of emotional distress" but such claims are rarely successful and to succeed they have to be based on long term, repeated actions inflicted on a person that result in real physical or mental harm. Like, say, for example, calling a person on the phone repeatedly and threatening to kill them or kill one of their family members.
American courts of law generally don't tolerate frivolous claims based on petty grievances.
I doubt she will win but she can get funding through gofundme for lawfare. She doesn't have to win to punish them
"but ordinary Brits, including blacks, can’t help but notice their appalling frequency."
I wish the same could be said about American whites.
Whites are for the most part terrified to notice (or at least acknowledge that they have noticed). If they do notice they just buy more guns and let the shitshow continue.
However, getting Whites to publicly acknowledge black crime is not quite as hard as getting them to acknowledge the obvious role Jews play in legalizing it.
Hi Al,
They may not dare to talk about it, but don't you think most Americans, of whatever color, notice this? In Philly, everyone knows where the lethal boundaries are. In South Philly, if you go east of Broad and south of Washington after dark, you're asking for it. Even in the daytime, most don't risk straying into Point Breeze. Most never get off at Sommerset, Huntingdon or 60th Street Station, etc. Almost no one in the entire region ever goes to Camden or Chester.
Linh
Many probably notice it but can't acknowledge it even to themselves.
Whites and Asians try to stay clear of black areas. Hispanics try and drive them out of Hispanic areas. However, whites cling to the idea that the area is bad just because of a lot of poor people not because it is black.
I think it was Sam Francis who wrote that liberals lead their lives as though they were members of the KKK.
For about three decades I lived in a rather poor section of Sacramento, California. Sacramento is to a considerable extent a working-class town in the agrarian Central Valley, 100 miles north east, and a world away, from well-heeled San Francisco. Rice farms and fruit orchards are a big part of the regional economy. Blue Diamond Almonds is headquartered in Sacramento.
I worked at Sacramento City College for a number of years. Very much a working class school. (By working class I mean people who don't have trust funds and won't inherit large wealth and will thus have to work and somehow "earn" a living.) Sac. City as the college was called, served as a sort of stepping stone for intelligent but poor young people, coming from a background of no means, to vault their way into the University of California (UC)higher educational system (if they had the intellectual acumen) and from there often into high paying jobs in the San Francisco Bay Area, Silicon Valley or Los Angeles and Orange County where the defense industry (by way of taxpayer funded government contracts in the Military Industrial Complex) is a big employer and provider of good salaried employment.
To make a tedious long story short, many of the working-class young women at Sac. City would sometimes (often?) wear suggestive clothing like the young woman in the current essay. Much if not all of this casual clothing was made by a company called, I believe, "Pink." The clothes often had short, pithy sayings on the buttock or breast area with trite comments such as, "Nope, not today." Or, "You Wish." Suggesting that the viewer, apparently presumed to be a leering male, maybe any and every male in the vicinity of the young women, was looking at her and lusting after her.
Perhaps because I was considerably older than most of the students I found this sort of personal advertisement tedious at best and offensive and insulting perhaps at worst.
My only point being the young woman mentioned at the beginning of today's essay has a long pedigree. The idea conveyed by the writing on her t-shirt "I love money only" being, "I will never love you" (the staring male) so don't bother me and go away. The conceit by the female wearer being that virtually every man is out to seduce her but she's going to nip that nascent relationship in the bud without the need to engage in the most perfunctory conversation. I always felt a sort of sad pity for these young women in that as alluring and sexually attractive as they might be at 19 or 21, in another 10 to 15 years, if they hadn't yet "snagged" a man they would find themselves overlooked by the very men who once leered at them (or were perceived to have done so). Such men, now in their thirties and perhaps making decent money, if not already married, now having their eyes on the next younger generation of younger women unencumbered by facial wrinkles and fat. (At least as of now.)
I don't know if this behavior (wearing clothing that essentially insults a man before he has even attempted to open a conversation) is peculiar to the working class females in Sacramento but it interesting (and one might say discouraging) at least to me, to see a bit of it appearing in Vietnam.
Sort of the ancient, perennial "war between the sexes" taken to a modern, semi-literate low point in which conversation is precluded by a snide pre-prepared insult on a t-shirt. (This is arguably an aspect of what some other commentators have called "Californiacation", a debasement of an entire society by consumerism and commercialization and commodification of everything including human beings, but I will spare the reader further rambling.)
I saw that Olympic boxing match in which an obvious male pummeled a female boxer. To me this is an example of how transsexuality and "gender dimorphism" become toxic. (As society attempts to accommodate perversions in the name of "inclusivity.") Letting a large man beat the crap out of a small woman is not "inclusive" it is idiotic and cruel. And perverse.
Jan van Bijlert’s The Feast of the Gods is indeed an intermediate step between DaVinci's Last Supper and the tableau of travesty at the Paris Olympics. Here's what it looks like. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_van_Bijlert#/media/File:Bijlert_-_Le_Festin_des_dieux_-_09-530998.jpg
There is a Christ figure talking to one apostle, but the rest is pagan revelry, including one or two gods, Dionysus and Poseidon. There are no fat butch DJ's or obvious transvestites. There are hetero attractions abounding and inebriation evident. A sober Jesus appears to be visiting at the banquet (and he's brought his heavenly retinue of putti along, maybe to extract him if things get out of hand). It doesn't appear to be a mockery of Christian morality so much as light-hearted satire w/ a winking subtext about who were the original celebrators of fleshly bread and blood infused wine for committed devotees.
I think Jews and free masons weaponize paganism into an attack on Christian values. They taunt w/ distortions of a lost culture which did not believe "do what thou wilt" was the quintessence of Greco-Roman morality as they pretend.
"Sorry, I love money only." (Printed on the young woman's t-shirt.) I always get a good laugh out of people who lust after money. It's kind of like a person who falls in love with an actor's characture in a television show. Not understanding that the characture is not real and doesn't really exist.
Money -- as in physical bills -- is a convenient means of exchange and a representation of wealth. It has value so long as a society collectively agree it has value. Once that agreement is lost money becomes just paper little better than toilet paper to be crude about it.
God save me from boring the reader with the history of paper currency; how it was once backed by gold; how it can be inflated into worthlessness by government overprinting (e.g. Wiemar Germany); how the U.S. dollar's value is (more or less) preserved and held steady by the Federal Reserve Bank; how Alexander Hamilton in 1800 put the dollar on firm footing by, as the first Secretary of Treasury, understanding that a nation's currency would be sound only if its increase did not exceed the growth of goods and services in the economy; and finally, how the BRIC trade bloc may in not too many years undermine the value of the U.S. dollar; (neither to dwell on how the Bretton Woods Agreement after World War Two, very shrewdly crafted by U.S. planners, elevated the U.S. dollar to the Reserve Currency of the world for the past 75 years and which may soon be undermined by the BRIC trade bloc, and the Shanghai Accord.)
People who know what real wealth is invest in valuable real estate and precious metals. (The main reason gold and precious metals have sustained value is they are perceived to be finite in quantity; they can not be debased, devalued or inflated away by the government as paper money can be.) They don't invest (or invest very little) in "money" or paper currency. That's why Bill Gates and China (the CCP) are buying up valuable American farm land.
Hold on to your wallets, folks. So if you're like this young woman and "love only money", now that China and her BRIC economic allies are in the driver's seat, it could be a wild ride for U.S. "money".
Better watch the Charlie Hebdo pictures/cartoons you post, Linh--soon the fatwa police will be out looking for you! 🤣
The white horse reminds me of one of the last episodes of 'Game of Thrones' where a white horse wanders through the streets of a destroyed city that is inhabited by the dead and dying among the remains of burning, crumbling buildings. The city was destroyed by dragons which are not so far from missiles and drones if you think about it. GOT had some powerful moments.