Discussion about this post

User's avatar
An Observer (Teresa L)'s avatar

There's something that was done to young Americans (via media/EMF manipulation?) in the last two decades to make so many of them take such extensive body-mutilating tattoos.

And those who unthinkingly ape the US entertainment industry and culture are also getting them (e.g., my home country of the Philippines).

Years ago, I asked a bright, sane, responsible lab tech with tattoos covering both arms and her whole back, who was then in her 30s with a couple of children, why she had them done.

"I was dumb. I thought it was so cool then, as a 17-yr-old."

She's been seeking to have them removed for years now, but that's a big and expensive job that isn't covered by "insurance." So, as far as I know, she still has them.

A Catholic friend who lived in Germany with her spouse on a US base said that the only women in the country who sported tattoos were the wives of US servicemen; no German women had them (this was about a decade ago; not sure if it's changed for Germans today).

Just stunned at the bold truths put forth in this magnificent essay. Thank you, Linh!

Expand full comment
Linh Dinh's avatar

Hi everyone,

I just added the below two third of the way into the article:

"For a black, brown or yellow man, a white woman is a particularly special treat, if she's even available, so he's willing to pay much more. Whites, on the other hand, often prefer a brown or yellow whore. Her being tiny or childlike only makes him feel more manly. Her broken English adds to this illusion. Bitch's just learning how to speak."

Linh

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts